Giant unruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysms causing angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is a rare cardiac anomaly which can be congenital or acquired. Patients with SVA are commonly asymptomatic when the occupying effect of SVA is insignificant, while ruptured SVA usually causes severe symptoms including heart failure and myocardial ischemia. CASE PRESENTATION: We present an unusual case of a 64-year-old female manifesting with exertional dyspnea as well as angina pectoris for three months. Echocardiography and cardiac computed tomographic angiography confirmed unruptured left-coronary and non-coronary SVAs. The left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery were stretched and compressed by the SVA which causing myocardial ischemia. The patient finally received aortic root replacement (Bentall procedure) and got symptom relieved. CONCLUSIONS: Giant unruptured SVA originating from left coronary sinus is extremely rare. Our case highlights that giant SVA should be considered in cases with angina pectoris. Echocardiography and coronary computed tomographic angiography are useful and important for diagnosis. Surgery is highly recommended in patients with SVA.

Exertional angina after cardiac bypass surgery successfully solved by endovascular occlusion of unligated lateral costal artery.

The internal mammary artery has become the primary conduit for the surgical revascularisation of the left anterior descending artery. Large side branches of internal mammary artery are typically ligated during cardiac surgery to avoid a potential coronary steal phenomenon. However, ligation of side branches can be unsuccessful due to the technically difficult surgical exploration of internal mammary artery branches. In this article, we present a case of a man who suffered from exertion angina pectoris despite successful surgical revascularisation of occluded left anterior descending artery by the internal mammary artery bypass. The coronary steal syndrome caused by the mighty side branch of internal mammary artery, that is, lateral costal artery was concluded as the reason of exertional angina. The endovascular procedure was performed and the lateral costal artery was successfully occluded using vascular plug. The occlusion of lateral costal artery has led to a complete disappearance of the exertional angina.

Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status in the ISCHEMIA Trial.

BACKGROUND: The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on angina-related health status (symptoms, function, quality of life) in chronic coronary disease (CCD) has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: Among patients with CCD randomized to invasive (INV) vs conservative (CON) management in ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches), we compared the following: 1) the impact of anatomic and functional CR on health status compared with incomplete revascularization (ICR); and 2) the predicted impact of achieving CR in all INV patients compared with CON. METHODS: Multivariable regression adjusting for patient characteristics was used to compare 12-month health status after independent core laboratory-defined CR vs ICR in INV patients who underwent revascularization. Propensity-weighted modeling was then performed to estimate the treatment effect had CR or ICR been achieved in all INV patients, compared with CON. RESULTS: Anatomic and functional CR were achieved in 43.3% and 57.8% of 1,641 INV patients, respectively. Among revascularized patients, CR was associated with improved Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency compared with ICR after adjustment for baseline differences. After modeling CR and ICR in all INV patients, patients with CR and ICR each had greater improvements in health status than CON, with better health status with CR than ICR. The projected benefits of CR were most pronounced in patients with baseline daily/weekly angina and not seen in those with no angina. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CCD in ISCHEMIA, health status improved more with CR compared with ICR or CON, particularly in those with frequent angina. Anatomic and functional CR provided comparable improvements in quality of life. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).

Angina in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with angina undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: A total of 1687 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR at our center were included and classified according to patient-reported angina symptoms prior to the TAVR procedure. Baseline, procedural and follow-up data were collected in a dedicated database. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients (29%) had angina prior to the TAVR procedure. Patients with angina at baseline showed a worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (NYHA class> II: 69% vs 63%; P=.017), a higher rate of coronary artery disease (74% vs 56%; P <.001), and a lower rate of complete revascularization (70% vs 79%; P <.001). Angina at baseline had no impact on all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.71-1.48; P=.898) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.2; 95%CI, 0.69-2.11; P=.517) at 1 year. However, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.71-13.8; P=.003) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 20.7; 95%CI, 3.50-122.6; P=.001) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR had angina prior to the procedure. Angina at baseline did not appear to be a sign of a more advanced valvular disease and had no prognostic impact; however, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Treatment of a Mandibular Abscess in a Patient with Coronary Artery Disease and Intermittent Angina.

An in-depth understanding of coronary artery disease will be critical to providing safe and effective dental care. Individuals with ischemic heart disease are at increased risk for anginal symptoms during dental care. Consultation with a cardiologist is advisable to ascertain cardiac stability for dental care if a patient has undergone recent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (less than 6 months ago). Judicious use of vasoactive agents during dental treatment is recommended. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications should be continued and local hemostatic measures used to control bleeding.

Surgical intervention of myocardial bridge combined coronary artery disease: could a combination of supra-arterial myotomy and CABG be a better option?

BACKGROUND: The treatment of coronary artery disease combined with severe atherosclerotic stenosis proximal to a left anterior descending artery myocardial bridge (LAD-MB) is still controversial. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of surgical intervention in patients with severe atherosclerotic stenosis proximal to a LAD-MB. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with coronary artery disease combined with severe atherosclerotic stenosis proximal to the LAD-MB. The enrolled criteria were systolic compression of LAD more than or equal to 50% and atherosclerotic stenosis proximal to the LAD-MB more than or equal to 70%. All patients suffered from anginal symptoms refractory to medical therapy. All patients received supra-arterial myotomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures. Clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2021, sixteen patients underwent supra-arterial myotomy and CABG procedure. The compression and length of LAD-MB were 63 ± 17.9% and 25.9 ± 16.3 mm, respectively. Of the 16 patients, one patient had a LAD-MB and proximal coronary stenosis, and 15 patients had LAD-MBs and multivessel lesions. All patients survived and recovered uneventfully without in-hospital mortality or severe complications. The median transfusion amount of red blood cells in the operation was 2 units, and no patients required unplanned reoperation for bleeding. The average length of intensive care unit stay was 2.74 days. Fifteen patients were followed up for 6-146.1 months (mean 45.3 ± 42.9 months). One patient had a recurrence of angina pectoris one year after surgery, and 14 patients had no symptoms of myocardial ischemia during the follow-up period. Significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire assessment was observed in all five categories after surgery (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, supra-arterial myotomy and concomitant bypass surgery may be a better option for the treatment of LAD-MB combined with severe proximal stenosis.

Coronary sinus Reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: A multicenter initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: The coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) device has emerged as a complementary therapy in patients with severe angina refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to revascularization. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of the CSR in a real-world setting. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with refractory angina (RA) and evidence of myocardial ischemia attributable to the left coronary artery considered unsuitable for revascularization were treated with the CSR at two centers between May 2017 and July 2019. Safety endpoints were procedural success and complications. Efficacy endpoints, assessed at six-month follow-up, were reduction in CCS class, improvement in quality of life (QoL) assessed using the short version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), and reduction in antianginal therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had end-stage coronary artery disease without revascularization targets and three had microvascular disease without epicardial stenosis. Procedural success was achieved in 23 patients, with two device/procedure-related complications and one anatomically-related failure to deliver the device. A total of 24 patients had the device implanted and entered the efficacy analysis. Eighteen patients (75.0%) had a reduction of at least one CCS class, 41.7% had a reduction of at least two classes, and 16.7% became asymptomatic, with a mean reduction in CCS class of 1.3±0.2 (p=0.001) at six-month follow-up. All SAQ-7 domains improved, notably physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.005) and QoL (p=0.006). There was a mean reduction in anti-ischemic drugs from 3.4±1.1 to 2.9±1.2 (p=0.010). CONCLUSION: In this real-world, multicenter experience, implantation of the CSR was associated with improvement in angina and QoL in patients with RA.

Determinants of Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Multivessel Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) quantifies the impact of angina on patient functionality and quality of life. There is scarce data on the impact of social determinants and comorbidities on SAQ-7 in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with planned staged PCI. METHODS: Patients completed a SAQ-7 before each PCI. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to study the impact of social determinants, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics on SAQ-7 scores at index PCI and at the time of the staged PCI. RESULTS: 531 patients were studied. Female sex, non-White race, coronary artery bypass graft history (CABG), and chronic lung disease were associated with lower baseline SAQ-7 scores. Overall, SAQ-7 increased between index procedure and staged PCI (11.9 ± 23.4). Body mass index (BMI) and the treatment of bifurcation lesions were independently associated with improvement of SAQ-7 between PCIs. Post-intervention, neither sex nor race was independently associated with changes in SAQ-7 scores. CONCLUSION: Different disparities and comorbid factors affect SAQ-7 before and after PCI. After revascularization, sex and race were not independent predictors of SAQ-7 improvement.

Impact of residual angina on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft for complex coronary artery disease.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on 10-year survival of patient-reported anginal status at 1 year following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and/or three-vessel CAD (3VD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this post hoc analysis of the randomized SYNTAX Extended Survival study, patients were classified as having residual angina (RA) if their self-reported Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency (SAQ-AF) scale was ≤90 at the 1-year follow-up post-revascularization with PCI or CABG. The primary endpoint of all-cause death at 10 years was compared between the RA and no-RA groups. A sensitivity analysis was performed using a 6-month SAQ-AF.At 1 year, 373 (26.1%) out of 1428 patients reported RA. Whilst RA at 1 year was an independent correlate of repeat revascularization at 5 years [18.3 vs. 11.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-2.15], it was not associated with all-cause death at 10 years (22.1 vs. 21.6%; adjusted HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.83-1.47). These results were consistent when stratified by the modality of revascularization (PCI or CABG) or by anginal frequency. The sensitivity analysis replicating the analyses based on 6-month angina status resulted in similar findings. CONCLUSION: Among patients with LMCAD and/or 3VD, patient-reported RA at 1 year post-revascularization was independently associated with repeat revascularization at 5 years; however, it did not significantly increase 10-year mortality, irrespective of the primary modality of revascularization or severity of RA.

Complete Revascularization vs Culprit Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina-Related Quality of Life in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the COMPLETE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), complete revascularization reduces major cardiovascular events compared with culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether complete revascularization also improves angina-related health status is unknown. Objective: To determine whether complete revascularization improves angina status in patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, multinational, open label trial of patient-reported outcomes took place in 140 primary PCI centers in 31 countries. Patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel CAD were randomized between February 1, 2013, and March 6, 2017. Analysis took place between July 2021 and December 2021. Interventions: Following PCI of the culprit lesion, patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD were randomized to receive either complete revascularization with additional PCI of angiographically significant nonculprit lesions or to no further revascularization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQ-AF) score (range, 0 [daily angina] to 100 [no angina]) and the proportion of angina-free individuals by study end. Results: Of 4041 patients, 2016 were randomized to complete revascularization and 2025 to culprit lesion-only PCI. The mean (SD) age of patients was 62 (10.7) years, and 3225 (80%) were male. The mean (SD) SAQ-AF score increased from 87.1 (17.8) points at baseline to 97.1 (9.7) points at a median follow-up of 3 years in the complete revascularization group (score change, 9.9 [95% CI, 9.0-10.8]; P < .001) compared with an increase of 87.2 (18.4) to 96.3 (10.9) points (score change, 8.9 [95% CI, 8.0-9.8]; P < .001) in the culprit lesion-only group (between-group difference, 0.97 points [95% CI, 0.27-1.67]; P = .006). Overall, 1457 patients (87.5%) were free of angina (SAQ-AF score, 100) in the complete revascularization group compared with 1376 patients (84.3%) in the culprit lesion-only group (absolute difference, 3.2% [95% CI, 0.7%-5.7%]; P = .01). This benefit was observed mainly in patients with nonculprit lesion stenosis severity of 80% or more (absolute difference, 4.7%; interaction P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD, complete revascularization resulted in a slightly greater proportion of patients being angina-free compared with a culprit lesion-only strategy. This modest incremental improvement in health status is in addition to the established benefit of complete revascularization in reducing cardiovascular events.

Coronary sinus reducer for the treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris.

Refractory angina represents the final stage of chronic coronary artery disease, where anginal symptoms persist despite complete epicardial coronary artery revascularization and maximally tolerated pharmacological therapy. Percutaneous narrowing of the coronary sinus with the coronary sinus reducer (Reducer®, Neovasc, Inc., Richmond, Canada) device was first attempted in humans in 2005 and has been shown to improve angina symptoms and the quality of life of patients suffering chronic refractory angina. It was recently included in the European guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndrome and is progressively gaining popularity. The authors hereby provide a review of current literature on the topic, intending to facilitate insights and to promote further research on this device and its clinical applications.

Coronary sinus reducer device implantation is a therapeutic option for patients suffering from chest tightness, discomfort and pain (collectively named angina when of clear cardiac origin), which persist for a long time despite optimal medical therapy and complete coronary revascularization. This is a novel device designed to be implanted, via a small puncture on the side of the neck, into the largest cardiac vein (i.e., the coronary sinus), to slow the outflow of blood from the cardiac venous system. Treatment is associated with significant improvement of symptoms in about 70­85% of patients, while granting little or no benefit in the remaining 15­30% for reasons that are yet to be determined. Importantly, the procedure has been shown to be safe and to have a very low rate of complications. Patients should keep this in mind when evaluating this therapeutic option.

Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina is a debilitating condition that affects the quality of life of patients worldwide, who after exhausting standard available therapies are regarded as "no option" patients. Recently, CS (coronary sinus) reducer (Neovasc Reducer) implantation became available and is gaining popularity in the treatment of refractory angina. The effectiveness of this therapy was demonstrated in 1 randomised sham-control trial and numerous uncontrolled prospective studies entailing several hundred patients altogether. We performed a meta-analysis to incorporate the data and elucidate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: A meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the effects of CS narrowing published in English to June 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients improving ≥ 1 class in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina score. Other end points included proportion of patients improving ≥ 2 CCS classes, procedural success, periprocedural complications, changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). RESULTS: Data from 9 studies including 846 patients were included. An improvement of ≥ 1 CCS class occurred in 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73%-80%) of patients. Improvement of ≥ 2 CCS classes was observed in 40% of patients (95% CI 35%-46%). Procedure success was 98%, with no major and 3% nonmajor periprocedural complications. Post procedural SAQ scores and 6MWT distance were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suffering from angina refractory to medical and interventional therapies, Reducer implantation improves symptoms and quality of life with a low complication rate. These results are consistent in 1 randomised trial and multiple prospective uncontrolled studies.

Efficacy of coronary sinus Reducer in patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus.

Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) implantation is currently recommended to relieve angina in patients with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and maximally achievable revascularization. The impact of diabetes mellitus on outcome after CSR implantation is at present unknown. We aimed to explore the impact of CSR in refractory angina patients with diabetes mellitus. Data from consecutive patients undergoing CSR implantation at four different centres between 2014 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the clinical response to CSR implantation defined as an improvement of ≥ 1 classes of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification. A total of 219 patients were included, 116 (53%) of whom had diabetes mellitus. The median age of the population was 69 years and 167 patients (76%) were male. There were no significant differences between groups of patients with and without diabetes mellitus with respect to CCS class at baseline (p value = 0.32) and at follow-up (p = 0.75). Over a median follow-up of 393 [224-1004] days, 84 (72%) of the patients with diabetes mellitus met the primary outcome, similarly to those without diabetes mellitus (p = 0.28). Fifty-three patients (24%) did not have an improvement in CCS class and no one experienced worsening of angina. CSR implantation was equally effective in improving angina symptoms among patients with refractory angina and diabetes mellitus compared to patients without diabetes mellitus.

Efficacy of coronary sinus reducer implantation in patients with chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery.

BACKGROUND: Clinical efficacy of coronary sinus reducer (CSR) in refractory angina (RA) patients with ischemia due to the chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the right coronary artery (RCA) remains unknown. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of CSR implantation in RA patients with CTO RCA and compare them to CSR recipients with left coronary artery (LCA) ischemia. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CTO RCA from 2 centers were prospectively included and compared to patients with LCA ischemia. All patients underwent evaluation of angina severity and quality of life (QoL) at baseline and after 12 months. In a subgroup of CTO RCA patients, stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was also performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with CTO RCA and predominant inferior and/or inferoseptal wall ischemia (the CTO RCA group) were compared to 24 patients with predominant anterior, lateral, and/or anteroseptal wall ischemia (the LCA group). While the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) anginascore mean (SD) improved in the CTO RCA group from 2.73 (0.46) to 1.82 (0.73) (P <0.001) and in the LCA group from 2.67 (0.57) to 1.92 (0.72) (P <0.001), there was no intergroup difference (P = 0.350). Significant improvement in all domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was observed. Stress CMR did not show a significant reduction of ischemic inferior and/or inferoseptal segments, however, improvements in the transmurality index (P = 0.03) and the myocardial perfusion reserve index in segments with inducible ischemia (P = 0.03) were observed in the CTO RCA group. CONCLUSIONS: In CTO RCA patients, CSR implantation alleviated angina symptoms and improved QoL. The extent of improvement was comparable to that observed in patients with LCA ischemia.

Beneficial effects of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with angina pectoris and coronary sinus reducer.

Limited data exists about the effectiveness of the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) device in patients with angina pectoris and atrial fibrillation (AF). This case demonstrates beneficial effects of AF ablation in a patient with CSR. We report four major findings: Rhythm control has a relevant effect on angina pectoris symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease and AF. In these patients, AF ablation should be considered at an early stage. Patients with persistent angina pectoris and CSR may require sinus rhythm for an optimal effect of the device. Selected coronary sinus (CS) interventions can still be performed through the mesh of the CSR device.